Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2336 14
Original file (NR2336 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
7o1 SS. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490

 

HD
Docket No. NR2336-14

22 November 2013

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy

Subj :
REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD

Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552

Encl: (i) DD Form 149 dtd 30 May le w/fattachments
{2) PERS-32 memo dtd 28 May 14

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject,
hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure {1) with this
Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be
corrected by removing the enlisted performance evaluation report for
7 January to 15 November 2008 (copy at Tab A), leaving in the record
the report for 6 January to 15 November 2009, submitted by a different
reporting senior (copy at Tab B).

2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Gorenflo and Green,

reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 5 June
2014, and pursuant toits regulations, determined that the corrective
action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of
record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
the enclosures and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining
to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations
within the Department of the Navy.

b. In enclosure (2}, the Navy Personnel Command (NPC) office
with cognizance over the subject matter of Petitioner's case has
commented to the effect that the reguest has merit and warrants
favorable action.
CONCLUSTON :

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence
of an error warranting the following corrective action.

RECOMMENDATION:

a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing the

following enlisted performance report and related material, leaving
in the record the report for 8 January to 15 November 2009, signed

by Captain M. L. Jordan, USN.
Period of Report

Date of Report Reporting Senior From To

cuee™ ee san 0915 Nov 09

b. That NO memorandum be filed in place of the report to be
removed.

c. That appropriate corrections be made to the magnetic tape
or microfilm maintained by NPC.

d. That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating
to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or completely
expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such entries or
material be added to the record in the future.

e. That any material directed to be removed from Petitioner's
naval record be returned to the Board, together with a copy of this
Report of Proceedings, for retention in a confidential file
maintained for such purpose, with no cross reference being made a

part of Petitioner's naval record.

4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board

for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations,
Section 723.6(c})-it is certified that a quorum was present at the

Board’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true
and complete record of the Board's proceedings in the above entitled

matter.

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN JONATHAN S. RUSKIN
Recorder Acting Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e)
of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records
(32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured
compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the

foregoing corrective action taken under the authority of reference
(a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of

the Navy.
TR D. Tre

ROBERT D.-ZSALMAN
Acting Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR933-13

    Original file (NR933-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Ms. Lapinski and Messrs. Dikeman and McBride, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 7 March 2013, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. f. In enclosure (6), PERS-32, the NPC office with cognizance over performance evaluations, commented to the effect that in light of enclosures (4) and (5), Petitioner’s performance evaluation record should be...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 02398-06

    Original file (02398-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Messrs. Hess, Lippolis and Swarens, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 14 September 2006, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the Navy Personnel Command (NPC) office having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner’s application has commented to the effect that his request has...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3355 14

    Original file (NR3355 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows: a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing the following enlisted performance evaluation report and related material: Period of Report Date of Report Reporting Senior From To 14 Nov 12 16 Nov 11 15 Nov 12 b. e. That any material directed to be removed from Petitioner's naval record be returned to the Board, together with a copy of this Report...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3499 14

    Original file (NR3499 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the enlisted performance evaluation report for 16 September 2011 to 25 June 2012 (copy at Tab A). e. That any material directed to be removed from Petitioner's naval record be returned to the Board, together with a copy of this Report of Proceedings, for retention in a confidential...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1666 14

    Original file (NR1666 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7o1 8S. CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an error warranting the following corrective action. naval record be returned to the Board, together with a copy of this Report of Proceedings, for retention in a confidential file maintained for such purpose, with no cross reference being made a part of Petitioner's naval record.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03884-06

    Original file (03884-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) , Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the enlisted performance evaluation report for 16 November 2004 to 29 June 2005, a copy of which is at Tab A, leaving in the record the report for 16 November 2004 to 1 July 2005, a copy of which is atTabB.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Hess, Lippolis and Swarens, reviewed...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 00167-10

    Original file (00167-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the enlisted performance evaluation report for 16 March to 1 October 2005, a copy of which is at Tab A, leaving in his record the report for 16 March to 4 October 2005, a copy of which is at Tab B. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Grover, McBride and Sproul, reviewed Petitioner's...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00167-10

    Original file (00167-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the enlisted performance evaluation report for 16 March to 1 October 2005, a copy of which is at Tab A, leaving in his record the report for 16 March to 4 October 2005, a copy of which is at Tab B. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Grover, McBride and Sproul, reviewed Petitioner's...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 03028-11

    Original file (03028-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the enlisted performance evaluation report for 16 March 2007 to 15 March 2008, reflecting an adverse mark of “Significant Problems” in block 45 (promotion recommendation) (copy at Tab A), and leaving in the record the report for the same period reflecting a block 45 mark of “Must...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 11540-10

    Original file (11540-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subj Sct, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record he corrected by removing the enlisted performance evaluation report for 2 November 2004 to 12 September 2005, a copy of which is at Tab A. The Board, consisting o a eens reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 9 December 2010, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...